By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaachyuth Menonparvathy Menonpadmanathan K.v
High Court
12 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaachyuth Menonparvathy Menonpadmanathan K.v
Date of order
12 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaachyuth Menonparvathy Menonpadmanathan K.v, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Department andconsidering the limited nature of plea sought for by the petitioner, thiswrit petition stands disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 12 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 22ND PHALGUNA, 1945WP(C) NO. 9438 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
M/S.GIANT PROPERTIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,LTDI TC 5 1416 5 MOTOR PLAZA HEIGHTS, NH ROAD, SREEKARYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, RAJU K. THOMAS, PIN - 695617
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNAACHYUTH MENONPARVATHY MENONPADMANATHAN K.V.
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER,NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 1100012THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 110001
OTHER PRESENT:
P.R. AJITH KUMAR -SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 9438 of 2024
JUDGMENT
Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment under theprovisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 application for stay before the 2[nd]respondent. The only limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3stay petition, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, and to suspend recovery of any amounts due in terms ofExt.P1, pending consideration of Ext.P3 stay petition.
2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Department also.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Department andconsidering the limited nature of plea sought for by the petitioner, thiswrit petition stands disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till such time the orders are
W.P.(C) No. 9438 of 2024
passed in Ext.P3, any proceedings for recovery of amount due interms of Ext.P1 shall remain suspended.
das
sd/-
GOPINATH P.,JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9438/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18DTD. 31-03-2022
Exhibit P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 28-08-2022
Exhibit P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTDTD. 30-08-2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.