By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon
High Court
14 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon
Date of order
14 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 14 DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 19314 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
M/S. S R TRADERS13/500A NEAR MALABAR CRUSHER, MANNANNUR PALAKKAD , REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SAFEEK.K., PIN - 679523
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNAPARVATHY MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 1100012THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI, PIN – 110001SRI JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON14.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed to direct the 2[nd] respondent toconsider and dispose of Exts.P2 appeal, P3 delay petitionand P4 stay petition, expeditiously and until such time todefer further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessmentorder.
2. The petitioner's case is that aggrieved by Ext.P1assessment order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2appeal on 03.06.2023 along with Exts.P3 delay petition andP4 stay petition. The petitioner is apprehensive that duringthe pendency of Exts.P3 and P4, the respondents mayenforce Ext.P1 order. Hence, the writ petition.
3. Heard; Sri.Harisankar V. Menon, the learnedCounsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Jose Joseph,the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. Having considered the pleadings and materials onrecord and taking note of the fact that Exts.P3 delaypetition and P4 stay petition are pending considerationbefore the 2[nd] respondent, I deem it appropriate to dispose
WP(C) NO. 19314 OF 2023
of the writ petition as follows:
(i)The 2[nd] respondent is directed to consider and
dispose of Exts.P3 and P4, in accordance withlaw and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a certified copy of this judgment,after affording the petitioner an opportunity ofbeing heard.
(ii)Needless to mention, if the 2[nd] respondentdesires to consider Ext.P4 stay petition and passany conditional order of stay, he shall statereasons for the same.
(iii)Until such time orders are passed on Exts.P3and P4, all further proceedings pursuant toExt.P1 shall stand deferred.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19314/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1COPYOF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 DTD. 22-12-2022
Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 03-06-2023Exhibit P3COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.02-06-2023Exhibit P4COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.02-06-2023
Exhibit P5COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 11417/2023 OFTHIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 11-04-2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.