Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 20 Aug 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
20 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/29TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 20569 of 2013 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M/S.HOPE MICRO CREDIT FINANCE INDIA PVT.LTD. 14/748, SREE SAKTHI COMPLEX, COIMBATORE ROAD, KALMANDAPAM, PALAKKAD – 678 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN RAJU KURIACHAN BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, PALAKKAD – 678 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM 689 018 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2013,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20569 of 2013 (U) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: P1:COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 14.12.2012. P2:COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTDATED 12.2.2013. P3:COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 12.2.2013. P4:COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT DATED 12.2.2013. P5:COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.7.2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SKV V.CHITAMBARESH,J ------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.20569 OF 2013 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 20[th] day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1order imposing penalty. The appeal is accompanied byExt.P3 petition for stay of the disputed amount. Thepetitioner is apprehensive of coercive steps even during thependency of the appeal and the petition aforestated. 2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P3petition with notice to the petitioner within a period of twomonths. Coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 order shall beput on hold in the meanwhile. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition with the judgment before the second respondentfor compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE. /True Copy/ P.A. To Judge SKV
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan