Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 30 Sep 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
30 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013/8TH ASWINA, 1935 WP(C).No. 23808 of 2013 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):---------------- K.T.IBRAHIM K T C VEGETABLES, MAIN ROAD, PATTAMBI PALAKKAD. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD II, PALAKKAD - 678 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2005-06 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2005-06 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(A)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2005-06 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2005-06 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(B)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2006-07 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(C)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2006-07 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(D)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2007-08 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2007-08 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(E)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2007-08 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2007-08 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(F)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(G)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1(H)-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/11/2012 FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(A)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(B)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(C)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(D)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(E)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(F)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(G)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P2(H)-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01/04/2013.01/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(A)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(B)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(C)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(D)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(E)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(F)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(G)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(H)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P4-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(C)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(D)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(E)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(F)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(G)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P3(H)-TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PEITIONER DATED 02/04/2013.DATED 02/04/2013. EXHIBIT-P4-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(A)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(B)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(C)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(D)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(E)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(F)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013.DATED 26/09/2013. : 3 : EXHIBIT-P4(G)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26/09/2013. EXHIBIT-P4(H)-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERDATED 26/09/2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: Nil. ---------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. ------------------------------- W.P (C) No.23808 of 2013 ------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] day of September, 2013 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 series appeals againstExt.P1 series orders imposing penalty. The appeals areaccompanied by Ext.P3 series petitions for condonation of delayand Ext.P4 petitions for stay of recovery of the disputed amounts.The petitioner is apprehensive of coercive steps even before thedisposal of the appeals and the petitions for condonation of delayand for stay. 2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P3series petitions for condonation of delay and Ext.P4 seriespetitions for stay with notice to the petitioner within a period oftwo months. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 series ordersshall be put on hold in the meanwhile. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writpetition with the judgment before the second respondent forcompliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH,Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan