By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
09 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
09 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/18TH PHALGUNA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7885 of 2017 (I)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
M/S. POPULAR FINANCE,
POPULAR TOWERS, VAKAYAR, KONNI,
PATHANAMTHITTA 689 698,
REPRESENTED BY PRABHA THOMAS, MANAGING PARTNER
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA - 689 001. CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA - 689 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-03-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 7885 of 2017 (I)
---------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE YEAR 2014-15FOR THE YEAR 2014-15
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENTTHE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
Msv/
P.S.TO JUDGE
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P(C) No. 7885 of 2017 I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 09[th] day of March, 2017
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against thepetitioner for the years 2014-15. Against this order,petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal, which is accompanied byExt.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent. The appealand the stay petitions are pending before the 2[nd]respondent. In the meanwhile, it is alleged, coerciveproceedings have been threatened. It is in this context, thewrit petition has been filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that
the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shalldispose of Ext.P3 stay application within a period of two
WPC.No. 7885/2017
: 2 :
months from today and the coercive proceedings be stayed
until such orders are passed; which order shall determine
the matter thereafter.
3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this
judgment before the 2[nd] respondent for compliance.
Writ petition disposed of.
jma
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)//true copy//
P.A to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.