By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
08 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
08 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1939
WP(C).No. 7781 of 2018
PETITIONER(S):
USAPH K. MOOSA
PROPRIETOR, RAHMANIA TRADERS, 12/10, KAMMANTHARA (H),
VANDAZHY P.O. ALATHUR, PALAKKAD- 678 541
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-5, PALAKKAD- 678 001 WARD-5, PALAKKAD- 678 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) THRISSUR- 680 001 THRISSUR- 680 001
3. THE MANAGER
KARUR VYSYA BANK, VELLAN STREET,
SULTHANPETA, PALAKKAD- 678 001
R BY SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-03-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
EB
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
-----------------------------------------------
W.P. (C) No. 7781 of 2018
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 8[th] day of March, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner as against the assessment order filed
appeals before the 2[nd] respondent. Petitioner also movedstay applications. Ext. P3 and P3 (a) are the stayapplications.
2.There shall be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of
the applications within two months. Till then, all recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be keptin abeyance. If any garnishee order is issued, that order alsoshall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of stayapplications.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.