Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 08 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
08 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1939 WP(C).No. 7765 of 2018 PETITIONER(S) THE SHOLAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOTTATHARA P.O., ATTAPPADI, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD - 678 581, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SANAL PAUL. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD NO. 4, PALAKKAD - 678 001. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD NO. 4, PALAKKAD - 678 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM - 682 036. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX GOVERNMENT PLEADER M.M. JASMINE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-03-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.EB//TRUE COPY// A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.----------------------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 7765 of 2018 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8[th] day of March, 2018 J U D G M E N T The petitioner as against Ext. P1 assessment orderpreferred Ext. P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent appellateauthority. Petitioner also moved a stay application. 2.In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to dispose of the application within 2 months after notice to the petitioner. Till disposal of stayapplication, all steps to recover the demand pursuant toExt. P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan