By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
18 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
18 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940
WP(C).No. 7989 of 2019
PETITIONER:
M/S. KONGAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
NO-P. 538, KONGAD POST, PALAKKAD - 678 631,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHYLA.K., AGED 55, D/O.C. GANGADHARAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.K.KRISHNA
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, PALAKKAD - 678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 021.
SMT. THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL
SRI. RAJU JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Ext. P1 assessment order underthe Income Tax Act, filed Ext. P2 appeal along with Ext.P4 delay
petition before the second respondent. The petitioner also filedExt.P3 stay application.
In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the
second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 and P4 within twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugnedorder in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
akv
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
CA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.