Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 18 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
18 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 7989 of 2019 PETITIONER: M/S. KONGAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO-P. 538, KONGAD POST, PALAKKAD - 678 631, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHYLA.K., AGED 55, D/O.C. GANGADHARAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, PALAKKAD - 678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 021. SMT. THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL SRI. RAJU JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext. P1 assessment order underthe Income Tax Act, filed Ext. P2 appeal along with Ext.P4 delay petition before the second respondent. The petitioner also filedExt.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 and P4 within twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugnedorder in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan