Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.kr...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon

High Court 08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 18TH POUSHA, 1940WP(C).No. 410 of 2019 PETITIONER: SREENI PARAMESWARAN AGED 41,S/O.PARAMESWARAN,VILLA NO.1,MYSTIC BELLS,NEARKANIOYAMPUZHA BRIDGE,EROOR, ERNAKULAM-682306. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SCBY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.M. JASMINE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order,filed Exts.P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. Thepetitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider the stay application filed bythe petitioner within a period of two months, afterissuing notice to the petitioner. Till disposal ofthe stay application, all recovery proceedings basedon the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P4COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL //True copy//P.A.To Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan