By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon
High Court
08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: DST -:3:- This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 18TH POUSHA, 1940WP(C).No. 396 of 2019
PETITIONER:
SHAJI AYYAPPANAGED 47 YEARS
S/O.V.S.AYYAPPAN, VILLA.NO.2, MYSTIC BELLS, NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM-682306.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-:2:-
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed an appeal as againstExt.P1 assessment order before the 2[nd] respondent.This appeal is pending for more than three years.When recovery sought to be effected, the petitionermoved stay application.
2.The learned standing counsel for therespondents objected granting of interim order,staying the recovery, citing that the petitioner hadnot moved before the 2[nd] respondent for the stay, whenthe appeal was filed. It is to be noted that Ext.P4recovery notice is initiated only on 06.12.2018. Inthe said circumstances, the petitioner moved a staypetition on 04.01.2019.
3.There shall be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider the stay application, withinone month, after notice to the petitioner. Till then,recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Ifthere is any delay, it shall be considered beforeconsidering the stay application.
DST
-:3:-
This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUEJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
//True copy//
P.A.To Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.