Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meer...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon

High Court 28 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
28 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014/7TH JYAISHTA, 1936 WP(C).No. 13475 of 2014 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------------- M/S. SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA, SHALOM NAGAR, GOPALAPURAM ROAD, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY JAISON JOY, MANAGING TRUSTEE. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------- 1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I, PALAKKAD.678 001. CIRCLE-I, PALAKKAD.678 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 002. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 002. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WP(C).No. 13475 of 2014 (H) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: --------------------------------------- EXT.P1- COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/02/2014. EXT.P2- COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 11/04/2014. EXT. P3- COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 11/04/2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: -----------------------------------------N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ===================== W.P.(C) No. 13475 of 2014======================Dated this the 28[th] day of May, 2014 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against thepetitioner. Against which, petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal, which isaccompanied by Ext.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent.Appeal and stay petition are pending before the 2[nd] respondent.In the meanwhile, coercive proceedings have been initiated. It isin this context, the writ petition has been filed. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shall dispose ofExt.P3 stay application within a period of one month from todayand the coercive proceedings be stayed until such orders arepassed, which order shall determine the matter thereafter. Writ petition disposed of. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE SB //True Copy //
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan