By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
High Court
28 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
28 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2014/7TH JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).No. 13475 of 2014 (H)
----------------------------
PETITIONER:
-----------------------
M/S. SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA, SHALOM NAGAR, GOPALAPURAM ROAD, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY JAISON JOY, MANAGING TRUSTEE.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I, PALAKKAD.678 001. CIRCLE-I, PALAKKAD.678 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 002. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 002.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
WP(C).No. 13475 of 2014 (H) -----------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
---------------------------------------
EXT.P1- COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/02/2014.
EXT.P2- COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 11/04/2014.
EXT. P3- COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 11/04/2014.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
-----------------------------------------N I L
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
Kss
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
W.P.(C) No. 13475 of 2014======================Dated this the 28[th] day of May, 2014
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against thepetitioner. Against which, petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal, which isaccompanied by Ext.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent.Appeal and stay petition are pending before the 2[nd] respondent.In the meanwhile, coercive proceedings have been initiated. It isin this context, the writ petition has been filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shall dispose ofExt.P3 stay application within a period of one month from todayand the coercive proceedings be stayed until such orders arepassed, which order shall determine the matter thereafter.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE
SB
//True Copy //
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.