By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
High Court
14 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
14 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 9789 of 2015 (W)
---------------------------
PETITIONER:
--------------------
THE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.104, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, JOLLY JOHN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALAPPUZHA RANGE, ALAPPUZHA-688001. ALAPPUZHA RANGE, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)V,
KERA BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM-682015.
3. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE-I, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695005. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695005.
BY SRI.P.K.R.MENON,(SENIOR COUNSEL) BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
mbr/
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9789 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------
EXT.P1 :COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 28.3.2013.DATED 28.3.2013.
EXT.P1(A) :COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 31.3.2014.DATED 31.3.2014.
EXT.P2 :COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2.4.2013.2ND RESPONDENT DATED 2.4.2013.
EXT.P2(A) :COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.4.2014. 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.4.2014.
EXT.P3 :COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 4.8.2014.3RD RESPONDENT DATED 4.8.2014.
EXT.P3(A): COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED DATED 19.6.2014. 3RD RESPONDENT DATED DATED 19.6.2014.
EXT.P4 :COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.8.2014.2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.8.2014.
EXT.P4(A) :COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.8.2014.2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.8.2014.
EXT.P5 :COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.9.2014.DATED 29.9.2014.
EXT.P6 : COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), KOTTAYAM DATED 20.3.2015.(APPEALS), KOTTAYAM DATED 20.3.2015.
EXT.P7 :COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 2.1.2015.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P(C). No. 9789 of 2015-------------------------------------------Dated this the 14[th] day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner has filed appeal before the 2[nd] respondentchallenging assessment orders for the years 2010-11 & 2011-12.Thereafter the files have been transmitted to the 4[th] respondent.The petitioner has remitted the amount as ordered in Ext.P5.Petitioner has approached this Court threatening recovery for theremaining amount.
2.Considering the fact that the petitioner has alreadypaid the amount as per Ext.P5 order of the appellate authority,I am of the view that, the appeal requires to be disposed of.Accordingly, following directions are issued:
(i)The 4[th] respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal asexpeditiously as possible, after hearing the petitioner.
(ii)Till disposal of the appeal, all recovery proceedings arestayed.
This writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.