Case Law › High Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.mee...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.meera V.menon

High Court 17 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

17 Oct 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/25TH ASWINA, 1938 WP(C).No. 18876 of 2004 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- V.P. SHANMUGHAN,VANGARATH PARAMBU, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 025. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-18. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. 3. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), RANGE 2, ERNAKULAM. BY SRI.P.K.R. MENON, SENIOR SC, ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC. rs. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18876 of 2004 (V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs. A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 18876 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28[th] day of June, 2016 JUDGMENT Parties not present. The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- A.M. Shaffique Judge ttb/28/06

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.