By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2017/13TH ASHADHA, 1939 W.A.No.1272 of 2017 IN WP(C)1236/2017 --------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 1236/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-01-2017 APPELLANT:---------- M/S.POPULAR PRINTERS VAKAYAR P.O, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PRABHA THOMAS. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS:------------ 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) AARATTUKULAKKARA COMPLEX, AN PURAM, ALAPPUZHA - 688 011. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), 3RD FLOOR AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003. R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-07-2017,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No.1272 of 2017 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 4[th] day of July, 2017 Antony Dominic, J. JUDGMENT Heard the counsel for the appellant and the learned StandingCounsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)1236/17. The said writ petition was disposed ofalong with two other writ petitions, the judgment of which were challenged by the appellant in W.A.Nos.901 and 903 of 2017.Those appeals were disposed of by judgment dated 1[st] of June2017, wherein after upholding the findings of the learned Single Judge this court ordered thus: “5. Be that as it may, from the submissions madebefore us we are informed that a part of the amountdue to satisfy the 15% as ordered by the learned SingleJudge has already been remitted by the appellant.Taking note of the above and also the financialconstraints that are projected before us, we allow theappellant a period of 8 weeks from today to satisfy thebalance amounts that is due.” W.A.No.1272 of 2017 : 2 : 3. Having regard to the common nature of the issuesinvolved, the appellant herein will also be entitled to the benefit ofeight weeks period granted by this court in the judgmentmentioned above. Ordered accordingly. Writ appeal is disposed of. sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jes sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE