By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/9TH PHALGUNA, 1938 WP(C).No. 6464 of 2017 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- THOMAS DANIEL, INDIKATTIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA.689 698. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S):-------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, THIRUVALLA.689 101. WARD 4, THIRUVALLA.689 101. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KOTTAYAM.686 001. KOTTAYAM.686 001. R1-2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-02-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: EL WP(C).No. 6464 of 2017 (G) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 30.01.2017 .EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31.01.2017.EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31.01.2017.EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF RR NOTICE IN ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 02.02.2017. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------NIL TRUE COPY EL K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ===================== W.P.(C)No.6464 of 2017 - E =========================Dated this the 28[th] day of February, 2017 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are aggrieved with the mobile tower, which is proposed to be constructed by the 4[th] respondent,nearby their property. The prayer is only for consideration ofExt.P4 petition filed against such construction, before theSecretary of the respondent Panchayath. 2. The petitioners are also appear through Counsel. Considering the fact that both the petitioners and the 4[th]respondent are here, it is deemed fit that the writ petitionitself to be disposed of, without any observation on merits,directing the 3[rd] respondent to consider the issue, within aperiod of one month from the date of production of a certifiedcopy of this judgment, if Ext.P4 petition is received in the W.P.(C)No.6464/2017 office of the 3[rd] respondent. The 4[th] respondent would also be entitled to file any objection, within a period of two weeks. The writ petition would stand disposed of. Sd/- SB/28/02/2017 K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE // true copy // P.A to Judge