Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.mee...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.meera V.menon

High Court 09 May 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
09 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon, Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MAY 2017/19TH VAISAKHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 15476 of 2017 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- BRIJESH MUTHALAMKUNNATH,PROPRIETOR, M/S. GEETHAM SWEETS,30/167, CITY POST OFFICE, PALAKKAD-14. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-I, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR- 680 001. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC. rs. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-05-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 DATED 29/12/2016. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/01/2017.2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/01/2017. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/01/2017.THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/01/2017. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTDATED 28/04/2017.DATED 28/04/2017. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs. ANU SIVARAMAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15476 of 2017 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 9[th] day of May, 2017 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P1 assessment order issued by the 1[st] respondent. The petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal along with a stay petition, Ext.P3, before the 2[nd]respondent against the assessment order. He seeks considerationof Exts.P2 and P3 by the 2[nd] respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader. There will be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to take up,consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P3 within a period ofone month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.Till such time, Ext.P4 demand shall not be enforced. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMANJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan