By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
High Court
08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. -Sd/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX //True copy//P.A.To Judge
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 18TH POUSHA, 1940WP(C).No. 424 of 2019
PETITIONER:
SHAJI AYYAPPAN,AGED 47 YEARS,S/O.V.S.AYYAPPAN, VILLA NO.2, MYSTIC BELLS, NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM-682306.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.M. JASMINE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-:2:-
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent.The petitioner also filed Exts.P3 delay petitionand Exts.P4 stay petition.
There shall be a direction to the 2[nd] respondentto dispose of the delay petition and the staypetition within a period of two months. Tilldisposal of the applications as above, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall bekept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
-Sd/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
//True copy//P.A.To Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.