Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meer...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon

High Court 01 Apr 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon
Date of order
01 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2013/11TH CHAITHRA 1935 WP(C).No. 8954 of 2013 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : --------------------- M/S.NADAKKAVIL HARDWARES PEEVEES BUILDING, KUTTIPPURAM ROAD, VALANCHERRY MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY N.HARIS MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S) : ----------------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER KOTTAKKAL-678001. 2. ASST.COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678001. R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-04-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BP WP(C).No. 8954 of 2013 (T) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT 28.11.2012. EXHIBIT-P2: COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 27.12.2012.RESPONDENT 27.12.2012. EXHIBIT-P3: COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 27.12.2012.RESPONDENT 27.12.2012. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : --------------------------------------- NIL. //TRUE COPY// BP P.A. TO JUDGE ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8954 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 1[st] day of April, 2013 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order for the year 2010-2011, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 staypetition. The appeal and the stay petition are pendingconsideration of the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile, inpursuance to Ext.P1 assessment order, this writ petition has beenfiled. 2. Taking note of the pendency of Ext.P2 appeal, I direct the2[nd] respondent to pass orders thereon. This the 2[nd] respondentshall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In themeanwhile, recovery of the tax due under Ext.P1 will stand stayedsubject to the petitioner remitting 1/3[rd] of the amount duethereunder and furnishing security for the balance. This conditionshall be complied with within two weeks from today. 3.Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and thewrit petition before the 2[nd] respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ps/1/4
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan