By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/19TH JYAISHTA, 1936 WP(C).No. 14451 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- M/S. ELITE AGRO SPECIALITIES, SIDCO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PERINGANDOOR, THRISSUR-680 581, REPRESENTED BY P.RAJAN, DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER - FINANCE. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------- 1. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RANGE 2, THRISSUR-690 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-V, ERNAKULAM-682 015. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), THRISSUR-690 001. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ON 09-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE Kss WP(C).No. 14451 of 2014 (F) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:--------------------------------------- EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17.3.2014. EXT.P2: COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 13.4.2014. EXT.P3: COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 13.4.2014. EXT.P4: COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/05/2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ------------------------------------------ N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss K.Vinod Chandran, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.14451 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9[th] day of June, 2014 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against the petitioner for the year 2010-2011. Against this order,petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal, which is accompanied byExt.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent. Appeal andstay petition are pending before the 2[nd] respondent. In themeanwhile, it is alleged, coercive proceedings have beenthreatened. It is in this context, the writ petition has beenfiled. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shalldispose of Exhibits P3 stay application within a period ofone month from today and the coercive proceedings bestayed until such orders are passed; which order shalldetermine the matter thereafter. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2[nd] respondent for compliance. Writ petition disposed of. jma Sd/-K.Vinod Chandran, Judge //true copy// P.A to Judge