By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon
High Court
21 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon
Date of order
21 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.meera V.menon Sri.mahesh V.menon, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under: (i)The second respondent shall consider theapplication for stay filed along with the appeal within a period W.P.(C) No.40523 of 2016 -2- of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 40523 of 2016 (M)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:------------------------
THE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PALACE ROAD,ALAPPUZHA-688001,REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER,JOLLY JOHN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
--------------------------
1. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I,ARATTUKULANGARA,ALAPPUZHA-688001 CIRCLE-I,ARATTUKULANGARA,ALAPPUZHA-688001
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), SASTRI ROAD,KOTTAYAM-686001. SASTRI ROAD,KOTTAYAM-686001.
3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX,
CIRCLE-I,ARATTUKULANGARA,ALAPPUZHA-688001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON21-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 40523 of 2016 (M) ----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE YEAR 2013-14
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :NIL
-----------------------
//TRUE COPY//
sm
P.A.TO JUDGE
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
-------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.40523 of 2016
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 21[st] day of December, 2016
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before the secondrespondent and along with the appeal, petitioner has also filedExt.P3, an application for stay. It is submitted that during thependency of the appeal, steps are being taken by therespondent authorities for recovering the amount in terms ofExt.P4.
2. Having regard to the fact that an appeal is pendingbefore the competent authority, I do not think it necessary toconsider the matter on merits. Suffice to say that the appellateauthority has to consider the stay application on merits withina specified time and in the meantime, the recovery can be keptin abeyance.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under:
(i)The second respondent shall consider theapplication for stay filed along with the appeal within a period
W.P.(C) No.40523 of 2016
-2-
of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the
judgment.
(ii)In the meantime, the demand made in terms of
Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.