Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 11 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
11 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No. 7262 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDP.B NO. 104, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, JOLLY JOHN, S/O. T.V JOHN. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1, ALAPPUZHA 688 011.CIRCLE-1, ALAPPUZHA 688 011. 2THE COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 680 001.SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 680 001. 3THE CHIEF MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, TOWN BRANCH, CCSB ROAD, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.STATE BANK OF INDIA, TOWN BRANCH, CCSB ROAD, ALAPPUZHA 688 001. 4THE CHIEF MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, ADB BRANCH, MULLACKAL, ALAPPUZHA688 001.STATE BANK OF INDIA, ADB BRANCH, MULLACKAL, ALAPPUZHA688 001. 5THE CHIEF MANAGER,KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, MULLAKKAL, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, MULLAKKAL, ALAPPUZHA 688 001. R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX R3 & R4 BY SMT.S.AMBILY, SC, SBI R5 BY SRI. GILBERT GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder, filed Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 staypetition before the 2[nd] respondent. In the light of the above, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of thestay petition within a period of two months, afterissuing notice to the petitioner. Till the disposalof stay petition recovery proceedings in Ext.P4,Ext.P4(a) and Ext.P4(b) based in the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. SMA Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUEJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR2011-12 EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FORTHE YEAR 2011-12 EXHIBIT P4COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BANK. EXHIBIT P4 (a)COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT BANK. EXHIBIT P4 (b)COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT BANK. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan