Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 21 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
21 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No.8545 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE MANNARKKAD TALUK CO-OP. EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.P-629, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD - 678 582,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.K. MOHANDAS, AGED 54,S/O. T.APPU NAIR BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD - 678 014 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 021 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.8545/2019 2 JUDGMENT Thepetitioner,asagainstExt.P1assessment order under the Income Tax Act,filed Ext.P2 appeal before the secondrespondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3stay application. Considering the facts and circumstances ofthe case, there shall be a direction to thesecond respondent to consider Ext.P3 stayapplication within two months. Till then,recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugnedorder in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUEJUDGE ln WP(C).No.8545/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan