Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 29 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
29 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI FRIDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 9706 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE MALAMPUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.P-907, KADUKAMKUNNU, MALAMPUZHA, PALAKKAD-678651, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K.K.PRATHEEP, AGED 44, S/O KUNHIKANNAN K.M. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021. SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Sri.Harisankar.V.Menon, the learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri.Jose Josph, the learned Standing Counsel forthe respondents. 2. The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously. 3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment. The recovery proceedings are stayed for two months fromtoday. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER OF THE YEAR 2016-17 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 27.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.1.2019EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.1.2019. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// Sd/- PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan