By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
High Court
21 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
21 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY ,THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 30TH PHALGUNA,1940
WP(C).No. 7548 of 2019
PETITIONER:
THE PUDUPPARIYARAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.F-1509, PUDUPPARIYARAM P.O, PALAKKAD-678 731, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VANAJA T.K, AGED 46, W/O. SATHEESH KUMAR.M.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021
MM JASMINE GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
..2..
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act,, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioneralso filed Ext.P3 stay application.
2.In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to take a decisionon Ext.P3 stay application within two months.Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to theimpugned order in the appeal shall be kept inabeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
..3..
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR2016-17
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.