By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
High Court
01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
01 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1941
WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019
PETITIONER:
THE PARLI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.F-6808, PARLI, PALAKKAD-678 612, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAMASWAMY.KAGED 41, S/O. KRISHNAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021.
SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH/., SRI NAVNEETH N NATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Harisankar V. Menon, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Navneeth N. Nath appeared on behalf of Sri.Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel.
2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously.
3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the
writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment.
Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appealbefore the second respondent are stayed for six weeks fromtoday.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.