Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
01 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019 PETITIONER: THE PARLI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.F-6808, PARLI, PALAKKAD-678 612, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAMASWAMY.KAGED 41, S/O. KRISHNAN. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021. SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH/., SRI NAVNEETH N NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019 JUDGMENT Heard Sri.Harisankar V. Menon, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Navneeth N. Nath appeared on behalf of Sri.Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel. 2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously. 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment. Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appealbefore the second respondent are stayed for six weeks fromtoday. Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGE WP(C).No. 9972 of 2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan