Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 15 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
15 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No.7997 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE KODUVAYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.P 756, KODUVAYUR, PALAKKAD-678521, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, KRISHNAKUMARI A., AGED 51, D/O. APPUKKUTTAN C. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.THUSHARA JAMES BY SRI.JOSE HOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ln JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2appeal before the second respondent. Thepetitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 stay application within twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuantto the impugned order in the appeal shall bekept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 27.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 15.1.2019. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 15.1.2019. BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan