Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 26 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
26 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 9202 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE MANNUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F-1582, MANNUR P.O., PALAKKAD- 678642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SUNDARESWARAN P.V., AGED 57, S/O.ACHUTHA VARIER. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD- 678014.WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD- 678014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),3RD FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR- 680001.3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, COCHIN- 682037. OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 9202/2019 J U D G M E N T Heard Smt.Krishna K., the petitioner's counsel and Sri Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel. 2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the thirdrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 stay petitionexpeditiously. 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writpetition is disposed of directing the third respondent to considerand dispose of Ext.P4 stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment. In the meantime the recovery proceedings pursuant to theorder under appeal before the third respondent is stayed. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE jjj PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P4 APPENDIX COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 DATED 15.03.2016. COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 DATED 02.01.2019. COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE3RD RESPONDENT YEAR 2010-11 DATED 23.03.2019. COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE3RD RESPONDENT YEAR 2010-11 DATED 23.03.2019.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan