By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
High Court
11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 22ND MAGHA, 1940WP(C).No. 3922 of 2019
PETITIONER:
THOMAS DANIEL,AGED 64 YEARSS/O DANIEL THOMAS, INDIKATTIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA-689698.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVALLA-689101.INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVALLA-689101.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),KOTTAYAM-686001.KOTTAYAM-686001.
MM JASMINE GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Exhibit P1 assessment
order, filed Exhibit P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent.The petitioner also filed Exhibit P3 stay application.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances, there
shall be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider thestay application filed by the petitioner within a period oftwo months, after issuing notice to the petitioner. Tilldisposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedingsbased on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
SVP
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT2016-17 DATED 20.11.2018
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 28.1.19
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.