Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 18 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
18 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No. 8003 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: THE NAGALASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P.541CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P 541,KOOTTANAD, PATTAMBI,PALAKKAD-679533,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,KRISHNAKUMAR.N,AGED 38, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 3,AYAKAR BHAVAN,PALAKKAD-678014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR,THRISSUR-680021. OTHER PRESENT: THUSHARA JAMES GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stayapplication. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shallbe a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider the stay applicationfiled by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuingnotice to the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, allrecovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan