Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.kri...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon

High Court 12 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
12 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.k.krishnasmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No. 7299 of 2019 PETITIONER: THE KALLADIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,NO. P 7489, KALLADIKKODE, PALAKKAD- 678 596, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BINOY JOSEPH, AGED 43, S/O. JOSEPH. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.K.KRISHNASMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: SRI. JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner as against the assessment order passed bythe first respondent produced as Ext. P1, preferred an appealbefore the second respondent. Ext.P2 is the appeal. Thepetitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay petition. Ext.P1(37) is thedemand notice issued in the matter. In the light of the above, there shall be a direction tothe second respondent to dispose of the stay petition filed inthe appeal within two months. Till the disposal of the abovestay petition, all coercive steps to recover the demand, basedon the order impugned in the appeal, shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016- 17 DATED 26.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 16.1.2019. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 16.1.2019. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan