Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 18TH POUSHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 417 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: SREENI PARAMESWARAN,AGED 41 YEARSS/O PARAMESWARAN, VILLA NO.1, MYSTIC BELLS, NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM-682 306. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.M. JASMINE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent.The petitioner also filed Exts.P3 delay petition andExts.P4 stay petition. There shall be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent todispose of the delay petition and the stay petitionwithin a period of two months. Till disposal of theapplications as above, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. DST Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL //True copy//P.A.To Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan