By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
15 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
15 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 25TH POUSHA, 1940WP(C).No.1175 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
M/S.SHWAS HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, GROUND FLOOR, SHWAS MYSTIC HEIGHTS, PHASE-1,NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 036, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SREENI PARAMESWARAN, AGED 41, S/O PARAMESWARAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CORPORATE WARD-2(1), I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018.I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),ERNAKULAM-682 018.ERNAKULAM-682 018.
3THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, C.R.BUILDING 3RD FLOOR,(304), I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-18(304), I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-18
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ln
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 order underthe Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal beforethe second respondent. The petitioner also filedExt.P3 stay application.
In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to dispose ofExt.P3 stay application within a period of twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuantto the impugned order in the appeal shall be keptin abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.