By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
02 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
02 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The objection of the learned Standing Counsel is appreciatedand the writ petition hence is disposed of by directing the firstrespondent to consider Ext.P8, as is required expeditiously.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941
WP(C).No.17927 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
M/S.POPULAR TRADERSPOPULAR TOWERS, VAKAYAR P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, THOMAS DANIEL (AGED 63).
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH., GP. DR. THUSHARA JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 17927/2019
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration and disposal ofExt.P8. Ext.P8 is dated 22.05.2019 and no extraordinary reason ispointed out for timely disposal of Ext.P8.
2.The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents
submits that Ext.P8 would be considered in the manner the lawprovides for, on its own terms, and decision communicated topetitioner.
The objection of the learned Standing Counsel is appreciatedand the writ petition hence is disposed of by directing the firstrespondent to consider Ext.P8, as is required expeditiously.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
jjj
W.P.(C) No. 17927/2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018.RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE2ND RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 24.01.2019.2ND RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 24.01.2019.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 24.01.2019.BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2016-17 DATED 24.01.2019.
EXHIBIT P4COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05.03.2019.DATED 05.03.2019.
EXHIBIT P5COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.7546/19 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 15.03.2019.HON'BLE COURT DATED 15.03.2019.
EXHIBIT P6COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.967/19 OF THIS HON'BLECOURT DATED 01.04.2019.COURT DATED 01.04.2019.
EXHIBIT P7COPY OF ORDER IN SLP (C) NO.9543/19 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 15.04.2019.COURT DATED 15.04.2019.
EXHIBIT P8COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.05.2019.BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.05.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.