Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 08 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
08 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 19TH MAGHA, 1940WP(C).No.3783 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: M/S.POPULAR TRADERS, POPULAR TOWERS, VAKAYAR P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, THOMAS DANIEL (AGED 63). BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA- 689 101.CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA- 689 101. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM- 686 001.DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM- 686 001.3THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVALLA- 689 101.THIRUVALLA- 689 101. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 order under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal beforethe second respondent. The petitioner also filedExt.P3 stay application. In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to disposeExt.P3 stay application within a period of twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuantto the impugned order in the appeal shall be keptin abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 24.12.2018 EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 20.11.2018 EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 23.1.2019 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan