By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
14 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
14 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 23RD PHALGUNA,1940
WP(C).No. 7649 of 2019
PETITIONER:
THE KANHIKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDCO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO. F-1086, KANJIKULAM P.O, PALAKKAD - 678 596, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K. SASIDHARAN, AGED 57, S/O. K. KRISHNANKUTTY MENON
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K. SASIDHARAN,
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD - 678014
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 021
THUSHARA JAMES GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
..2..
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioneralso filed Ext.P3 stay application.
2.In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to take a decisionon Ext.P3 stay application within two months.Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to theimpugned order in the appeal shall be kept inabeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
..3..
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17, DATED 26/12/2018
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR2016-17, DATED 16/01/2019
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 16/01/2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.