By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
14 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
14 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No.7678 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
THE THADUKKASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F.534, KERALASSERY P.O, KONGAD, PALAKKAD-678 641, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIJAYAKUMARI M.P.,AGED 50, D/O.NARAYANAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ln
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1 assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appealbefore the second respondent. The petitioner alsofiled Ext.P3 stay application.
In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 stay application within twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impugned order in the appeal shall be kept inabeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
WP(C).No.7678/2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.