Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 15 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
15 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 25TH POUSHA, 1940 WP(C).No.1131 of 2019 PETITIONER: M/S. SHWAS HOMES PVT. LTD.,GROUND FLOOR, SHWAS MYSTIC HEIGHTS, PHASE-I, NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI - 682 036, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SREENI PARAMESWARAN, AGED 41, S/O.PARAMESWARAN. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: OTHER PRESENT: SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.1131/2019 J U D G M E N T The petitioner moved the 2[nd] respondent in appeal as against Ext.P1 assessment order. The petitioner also filed a stay applicationas per Ext.P3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shallbe a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider the stay applicationfiled by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuing noticeto the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, all recoveryproceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp APPENDIX True Copy P.S to Judge smp
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan