Case Law › High Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 18 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

18 Mar 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No.8129 of 2019 PETITIONER: WAYANAD SOCIAL SERVICE SOCIETY1, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD-670 645, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, POWLOSE KOOTTALA JOSEPH. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: OTHER PRESENT: SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.8129/2019 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stayapplication. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shallbe a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider the stay applicationfiled by the petitioner within a period of two months, after issuing noticeto the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, all recoveryproceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp W.P.(C) No.8129/2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: True Copy P.S to Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.