By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
19 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
19 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 28TH SRAVANA, 1941WP(C).No.21015 OF 2019(B)
PETITIONER/S:
THE KALLADIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO. P 7489, KALLADIKKODE, PALAKKAD - 678596, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BINOY JOSEPH, AGED 43, S/O. JOSEPH
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 19.08.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).20995/2019(Y),THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.21015 & 20995 OF 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 28TH SRAVANA, 1941
WP(C).No.20995 OF 2019(Y)
PETITIONER/S:
THE ALANALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.F 1178, ALANALLUR, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678 601, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
SREENIVASAN P., AGED 47, S/O. SANKARAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001.SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19.08.2019, ALONG WITH WP(C).21015/2019(B), THE COURT ONTHE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Harisankar V.Menon, the learned counsel for
the petitioners and Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned StandingCounsel for respondents.
2.Petitioners refer to and rely on Ext.P5 judgmentdated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1529 of 2019 and connected cases
Petitioners refer to and rely on Ext.P5 judgment
to contend that the Division Bench directed disposal of appealsand granted stay of recovery during the pendency of theappeals.
3.The learned Standing Counsel admits that the factsof these cases are substantially same and similar to the facts
noted by the Division Bench in Ext.P5, hence the judgment inExt.P5 can be followed.
Hence, the writ petitions are disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent to
WP(C) NO.21015 & 20995 OF 2019
consider and dispose of the statutory appeals filed by thepetitioners herein at the earliest taking note of the Full Benchdecision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-operative BankLtd, v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC287] and to keep in abeyance recovery proceedings andcollection of tax assessed, pending disposal of such appeals.
JS
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
WP(C) NO.21015 & 20995 OF 2019
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21015/2019
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P4COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P5
COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1529/2019 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20995/2019
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 26.12.2018.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 18.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 16.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 16.7.2019.
EXHIBIT P5
COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1529/2019 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 1.7.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.