Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 05 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
05 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.

Decision: 2.Therefore, the above writ appeal is hereby allowed.The impugned judgment in WP(C) No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI MONDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1941 WA.No.1681 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17750/2019(P) OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE THADUKKASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,NO. F 534, KERALASSERRY P.O, KONGAD, PALAKKAD-678 641, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIJAYAKUMARI M.P, AGED 50, D/O. NARAYANAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001 SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON05.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM &R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- W.A.No. 1681 OF 2019 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5[th ] day of August, 2019 JUDGMENT Abdul Rehim,J A batch of identical writ appeals were disposed of bythis Court through the judgment in W.A No. 1639/2019 andconnected cases, dated 19.07.2019. The circumstancesprevailing are identical in nature. Hence, by following the saidjudgment, we are inclined to allow the above writ appeal. 2.Therefore, the above writ appeal is hereby allowed.The impugned judgment in WP(C) No. 11750/2019 is hereby setaside. The order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Thrissur in I.T.A No. 311/18-19 is hereby set aside tothe extent it insisted upon payment of 20% of the balancedemand for granting stay, pending disposal of the appeal. TheAppellate Authority is directed to consider and pass appropriateorders in the appeal itself after affording opportunity of hearingto both sides, at the earliest. Collection and recovery of the disputed demand shall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of theappeal. Sd/-C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. Sd/-R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JUDGE. lsn -:4:-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan