By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
13 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
13 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1941
WP(C).No.21946 OF 2019(P)
PETITIONER:
P.P.UNNEENKUTTY, AGED 68 YEARS,S/O P.P.MOHAMMED,PARAMBIL PEEDIKAKKAL HOUSE, THACHAMPARA P.O. PALAKKAD-678 593.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
BY ADV.SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON13.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
akv
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder issued by the first respondent under IncomeTax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the secondrespondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stayapplication.
In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 stay application within a periodof two months. Till then, recovery proceedingspursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shallbe deferred.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 29.1.2019
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 10.7.2019
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
C.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.