Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 25 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
25 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI MONDAY ,THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 8958 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: M/S.SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIASHALOM RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SHALOM NAGAR, KOSATHARA, CHITTUR P.O.PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, K.T.THOMAS. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: OTHER PRESENT:SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 8958/2019 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2.The petitioner, aggrieved by the assessment order dated30.12.2018, has filed appeal and stay petition, evidenced as ExhibitsP2 and P3. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the appellateauthority is yet to consider and dispose of the stay applicationmoved by the petitioner. The petitioner, aggrieved by the assessment order dated 3.I have perused the records. I am satisfied that the prayerof the petitioner for expeditious disposal of stay application isreasonable, the remedy of appeal since is availed under the IncomeTax Act. The following direction is issued to meet the ends ofjustice. 4.The appellate authority/the second respondentconsiders and disposes of the stay application (Ext.P3) asexpeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from today. W.P.(C) No. 8958/2019 The writ petition ordered as indicated above. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE jjj APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 30.12.2018 EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE 2016-17 DATED 31.1.2019 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 31.1.2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan