Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 23 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
23 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection, without any observation on the merits of thematter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942 WP(C).No.9162 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: THE THACHAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3150,MAIN ROAD, THACHAMPARA, PALAKKAD-678593, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JAYAKUMAR M., AGED 54, S/O.LATE PADMANABHAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014.WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR-680021.THRISSUR-680021. 3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. OTHER PRESENT: R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. Vinod Chandran, J. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- Dated this the 23[rd] day of March, 2020 JUDGMENT The writ petition is against the recoveryinitiated while an appeal is pending. The issue is alsowith respect to the coverage of the petitioner underSection 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which has to beadjudicated on the basis of the Full Bench decision inMavilayil Service Co-operative Bank Limitedv. Commissionerof Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287 (FB)]. 2. In the present case, the demand is with respectto assessment year 2012-13. Exhibit P3 second appeal alongwith Exhibit P4 stay petition are pending before theTribunal. In the circumstance of the case, I am of theopinion that there shall be a stay of recovery till theappeal is disposed of. The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection, without any observation on the merits of thematter. Vku/- Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 25.3.2015. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 17.02.2020. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT 2012-13 DATED 13.03.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13.3.2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan