By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
23 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
23 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: In thecircumstance of the case, I am of the opinion that there shallbe a stay of recovery till the appeals are disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942
WP(C).No.9153 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
THE ARIYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KOTTOPADAM P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
N.P.KARTHIAYANI, AGED 49, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN,
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014.WARD 1, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR-680021.THRISSUR-680021.
3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
OTHER PRESENT:
R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).9155/2020, WP(C).9157/2020, THE COURTON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942
WP(C).No.9155 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
THE ARIYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KOTTOPADAM P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.P.KARTHIAYANI, AGED 49, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN.
BY ADVS.
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
OTHER PRESENT:
R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).9153/2020, WP(C).9157/2020, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1942
WP(C).No.9157 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
THE ARIYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KOTTOPADAM P.O., MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.P.KARTHIAYANI, AGED 49, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN.
BY ADVS.
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
OTHER PRESENT:
R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.03.2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).9153/2020, WP(C).9155/2020, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
-------------------------------------
W.P(C) No.9153, 9155 and 9157 of 2020-------------------------------------Dated this the 23[rd] day of March, 2020
JUDGMENT
These writ petitions are against the recovery
initiated while appeals are pending. The issue is also withrespect to the coverage of the petitioner under Section 80P ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, which has to be adjudicated on thebasis of the Full Bench decision inMavilayil ServiceCo-operative Bank Limitedv.Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287 (FB)].
2. In the present case, the demand is with respect toassessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. Exhibit P3 secondappeal along with Exhibit P4 stay petition in the respectivewrit petitions are pending before the Tribunal. In thecircumstance of the case, I am of the opinion that there shallbe a stay of recovery till the appeals are disposed of.
The writ petitions are disposed of with the abovedirection, without any observation on the merits of the matter.
Vku/-
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9153/2020
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9155/2020
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9157/2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.