By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
13 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
13 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.5498 OF 2020(J)
PETITIONER/S:
THE ALANALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F 1178ALANALLUR, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678 601, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SREENIVASAN P., AGED 47, S/O. SANKARAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI.JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 13.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.G.ARUN, J.
-----------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No. 5498 of 2020
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 13[th] day of March, 2020
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a Primary Agricultural Credit Society, had filedappeal against Exhibit P1 assessment order for the year 2014-2015. ByExhibit P2 order, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissedthe appeal, rejecting the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section80P of the Income Tax Act. Aggrieved, the petitioner has preferredExhibit P3 appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Authority. Alongwith the appeal, the petitioner has preferred Exhibit P4 stay petitionalso. The prayer in this writ petition is for expeditious consideration ofeither the appeal or the stay petition and to defer the recovery stepspursuant to Exhibit P1 assessment order, till a decision is rendered oneither the appeal or the stay petition.
2. Heard the learned Standing for the Income Tax Departmentalso.
3. Considering the limited relief sought, the writ petition isdisposed of directing the 3[rd] respondent Tribunal to consider Exhibit P3appeal as expeditiously as possible. Till final orders are passed in the
appeal, recovery proceedings based on Exhibit P1 assessment ordershall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN, JUDGE
vgs
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 ATED 19.12.2016.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 10.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT 2014-15 DATED 3.2.2020.
EXHIBIT P4COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 3.2.2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.