By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
10 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
10 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2020/19TH ASHADHA, 1942W.P(C).No.13907 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER:
M/S.ELITE AGRO SPECIALITIESSIDCO BUILDING, PERINGANDOOR P.O.,ATHANI, THRISSUR – 680 581, REPRESENTED BY P. RAJAN, VICE PRESIDENT – FINANCE.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR,THRISSUR – 680 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)THRISSUR – 680 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 10.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
:: 2 ::
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act andExt.P1(a) rectification order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal andExt.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent. The limited prayer of thepetitioner is for a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orderson Ext.P3 stay petition expeditiously, and to keep in abeyance the recoverysteps pursuant to Exts.P1 and P1(a) orders, till then.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andalso the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as alsothe submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with thefollowing directions:
1. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass orderson Ext.P3 stay petition within a period of four monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,after hearing the petitioner.
2. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed
against the petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order andExt.P1(a) rectification order shall be kept in abeyancetill such time as orders are passed by the 2[nd]respondent as directed above and communicated tothe petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writpetition together with a copy of this judgment, beforethe 2[nd] respondent, for further action.
Sd/-A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
W.P.(C).NO.13907/2020
:: 4 ::
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1: COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18.
EXT.P1(A): COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION ORDER ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18.
EXT.P2: COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3: COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.