Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.5046 OF 2020(E) PETITIONER: THE THACHAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.3150, MAIN ROAD, THACHAMPARA PALAKKAD-678 593, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JAYAKUMAR M., AGED 54, S/O. LATE PADMANABHAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680 001. 3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALBY ITS REGISTRAR. AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682 030, REPRESENTED JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 24th day of February 2020 The petitioner, a co-operative society filed an appeal as against the assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the 3rdrespondent. The assessing authority insisted payment of 20% of thedisputed tax to grant stay against recovery, pending appeal. In the light of the various judgments of this Court, the appellateauthority-3rd respondent is directed to dispose the appeal within aperiod of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till then,the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Orderedaccordingly. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 22.12.2017. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 10.12.2019. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT - 2015-16 DATED 6.2.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.2.2020. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan