Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 10 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
10 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1942 WA.No.715 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5271/2020(H) OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: THE PATTAMBI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.P 585,RAZMALL COMPLEX, PALLIPURAM ROAD, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 303, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, C.GIRIJA, AGED 58, D/O. E.P.NARAYANAN NAIR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD - 678 014.WARD 3, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD - 678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 021. 3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALAAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682 030, REPRESENTEDBY ITS REGISTRAR. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.06.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Vinod Chandran, J. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the writappeal is infructuous. Writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/-T.R.RAVIJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan