Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera...

By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon

High Court 17 Aug 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
17 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1942 WA.No.1087 OF 2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 9771/2020(V) DT.18.05.2020 OF HIGHCOURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: N.K.VINOBA894A/16/560, NEELIMATHARA HOUSE, KOTTUVALLIKKAD, MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O., MOOTHAKUNNAM, N.PARUR-683 516, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 3, K.A.P COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OFFICE OF THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALUVARANGE, R.S.ROAD, ALUVA-683 101. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAMKULAM, KOCHI-682 036. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC. IT THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.08.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. Appellant is before us challenging the order ofthe learned Single Judge, which directed recoverysteps to be kept in abeyance on deposit of 10% andalso directed consideration of the stay petition bythe first Appellate Authority. Writ petitioner is inappeal contending that he has a good prima facie caseand there should be complete exemption from recoverywhen the appeal is pending. 2.We are in appeal and we cannot interfere withthe discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge,which we find to be more than reasonable. LearnedSingle Judge had directed deposit of 10% within aperiod of one month. Only since an appeal has beenfiled, the order has not been complied with and hencewe extend the time for another 30 days from the dateof receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Inthe context of the pandemic, we are of the opinionthat the appeal itself could be heard and disposed of and there is no requirement as of now to consider thestay petition. If the petitioner makes the deposit,recovery will stand stayed till disposal of appeal. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE Pn 05/08
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan