By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
High Court
21 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon
Date of order
21 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.sri.harisankar v. Menonsmt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2020 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1942
WA.No.598 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DTD. 05.03.2020 IN WP(C) 5494/2020(J) OF HIGHCOURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
THE KUMARAMPUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P 373,MANNARKKAD COLLEGE P.O., KUMARAMPUTHUR, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, N.KRISHNADAS,AGED 57, S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENONSMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 4, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678014.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680001.3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.05.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Vinod Chandran, J.
The appellant was before this Court seeking stay of thecontemplated coercive measures, till the appeal before theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal is disposed of on merits.
2.The learned Single Judge found that there were nocoercive steps of demand or attachment proceeded with underthe provisions of the Income Tax Act. Hence it was directedthat the application of stay before the Tribunal will be disposedof in accordance with law within a period of 15 days. The 15days period has expired but without such disposal, obviouslyfor the reason of lock down due to the pandemic.
3.It is admitted by the learned Counsel that there areno coercive steps taken even after the expiry of such period.However, the appellant apprehends that some coercive stepswould be taken and there be a stay of such steps at least tillthe stay application is considered. In such circumstances wemake it clear that the respondent authority shall not take anycoercive steps until the stay application or the appeal isdisposed of by the Tribunal, whichever happens earlier.
Writ appeal is disposed of. No cost.
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE
Sd/-T.R.RAVIJUDGE
Pn 21/05
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.